If we're arguing about what "great" games there are on the PS3, and thats why there's no reason to buy a X360......Yet they are mostly multi-platform...Why is there argument?
Why not just ask the question of "what system has the most, highest rated games of the 3?"
Xbox 360 (Top 50):
90%+ Games: 11
Game #50: Settlers of Catan (82.8%)
Wii (Top 50):
90%+ Games: 4
Game #50: Big Brain Academy: Wii Degree (69.1%)
Playstation 3:
90%+ Games: 3
Game #50: All Pro Football 2k8 (74.3%)
Maybe it's just me, but if I bought a system, shouldn't I buy it because it has the best library of good games? I mean, the X360 has more 90%+ games than the PS3 and Wii have, combined and 50% added...And the 50th best game on the X360 is very, very highly rated vs. the Playstation 3 and Wii's 50th best game. Is part or most of this because the X360 is older? Yes. Is it because it has games available on PC? Yes. But as a Console owner, I demand the best-quality games for my system. And the fact is, speaking from strictly a quality standpoint, the X360 is virtually unmatched, and will continue to be unmatched, this generation.
So what would you prefer: A Wii or PS3, where you get VERY FEW ultra-quality games, but are usually exclusive, or a system that has MANY ultra-quality games, but could be purchased if you had an expensive PC, or both of the other systems? Personally, I'd rather go with the biggest, best and cheapest, rather than buy a PC, a PS3, and a Wii and get roughly the same number of quality titles.
Back from the dead, I'm afraid.
