| o_O.Q said:
well if you think that its more likely that there's an endless chain up until infinity fair enough buddy lol but for me from my perspective its pretty simple |
You see, the problem you are running into is you are creating rules that cater to your beliefs, and indicate logic is required in certain instances but not others.
By indicating there must have been a God prior to the big bang, you have indicated that you believe there to be a logical rule in place where something must first exist (God) to create something else (Big Bang). You then proceed, however, to throw this logical rule away when going further yet back in time, and you now create a new logical rule, which indicates that nothing need exist in order to create something else (God). So you have actually made an argument based on the idea that one logical rule must always be present in one situation, but must never be present in another situation, where the complete opposite logical rule is present.
This isn't saying that God doesn't exist (I really don't know). It is saying that your logic for why God must exist is completely moot.
Money can't buy happiness. Just video games, which make me happy.
