ninjaman003 said:
From what I heard, it was really good, but realistically it was a zelda game and not a star fox game, leaving star fox fans disappointed. I don't think it was liked enough to get a remake, not that it doesn't deserve one. |
It wasn't even a Zelda game. It was Dinosaur Planet, which on it's own might've been pretty decent. But then they slapped the "Star Fox" coat of paint on it, which was just pointless. Totally pointless. Mind you, it was a far better game than the pile of aborted fetuses that was Star Fox: Assault, but it wasn't a "Star Fox" game, at all. In fact, there hasn't BEEN a good SF game since SF64, the best entry. Which is why I'm so nervious over this "Star Fox U" nonsense, both because of the talk of using motion control with the GamePad to aim (sounds stupid), and those little mini-game tech demos allegedly also being "related" to "Star Fox U". For the love of christ, I just want them to make a good, REAL Star Fox game, ala SF64, just with obviously way better graphics, way more impressive physics, and way more content. I mant my dream, honest-to-god sequel to SF64.
But I am very hesitant to believe that that is what I'll actually get. We'll see...........
