By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
whiteknight101 on 23 August 2014
Edit Thread
Leadified said:
whiteknight101 said:

Controversy therefore a crime. Classic stuff.

Fact is that with regard to the original controversy - the allegation that she fucked people in exchange for publicity, there is no proof whatsoever. Apparently she fucked one Kotaku journalist, and according to the cuck'ed boyfriend as far as he can prove that journalist didnt write anything about her or her game after they fucked.

All 4chan has done since then is pile on other, unrelated, accusations: she was mean to some other SJW indie developers, she faked getting doxxed, she got reddit and 4chan janitors to delete threads by having sex with them, etc.

I'm not sure if Godwin's Law really applies when the 4chan board which started all this literally spends its time disproving the Holocaust, proving that jews run everything, and trying to fake that a libertarian comic artist is a nazi by editing his comics. Not necessarily saying that /pol/ is nazi here, only that their aim is to entertain by any means possible, and upholding Truth and Good Taste isnt exactly their main priority.

I'm sure you know that already though.

Yeah controversies happen because there is conflict. You have a problem with that?

Of course there is no absolute proof on what she did unless she herself or the people she apparently slept with admitted it, but because of their massive censorship campaign, unwillingness to come forth and insulting of anyone who dares criticise, definitely raises some questions if there is more to the story. If Zoey's story is true and there was no foul play that contributed to her rise in this industry.

Your whole 4chan rant is just a mess. I really do not know what singling out 4chan has to do with anything, nobody brought up 4chan until your post. This whole controversy exploded around the internet, not just at 4chan. So you assume from all this that the OP got his sources from /pol/ and not only that but the OP also has to believe in the other shit he reads on /pol/ or else he is a hypocrite? But not only that but something as relatively minor as this situation is compared to stuff like the NWO, I mean come on man.


The controversy started on /pol/ specifically, then spread to /v/ and then "exploded" on the internet. All the phony "proof" (pastebins, .gifs, the usual stuff) is produced in many parallell threads on /pol/ and /v/ going on as we speak. So the nature and modus operandi of /pol/ is indeed quite relevant. Anyone interested can go there at any time and check it out, they love newfags. :^)

You already admitted that there is no proof whatsoever of quid-pro-quo, only conjecture, so what is the point of continuing a thread where OP asked why "anyone would defend" Quinn? The answer is obvious. She's a nobody accused of a bunch of stuff for which there is little proof. The big question is why anyone is talking about her in the first place, and the answer is that it helps a bunch of bored teenagers be less bored.