thx1139 said:
Most of the countries that have better scores do better with social safety net programs like feeding kids. A kid that is hungry doesnt learn well. Like either subsidies for single mother or poorer familes so the kids have care givers rather then people working multiple jobs and the kids being taken care of by the TV. So our direct spending for the schools are higher, but the indirect taking care of the poor children results in poorer results. So our poor kids go to school hungry and go home to an empty home. Other countries poor kids get fed and go home to a caregiver who has the time to work on studies with the kid. |
So children under the poverty level don't receive food stamps and free school lunches in the United States? I grew up in the bottom 5% and never went hungry. I'm finding it hard to believe that any poor person does in fact. My mother got $600 in food stamps a month, and I got free lunches everyday in school. Hell, in some states they send home vouchers so that kids can get lunches on the weekends from the supermarket. I honestly don't believe that poor people go hungry with the current welfare system in the United States, as I've experienced it first hand and know a multitude of people who have as well.







