binary solo said:
Doesn't make it right or reasonable. Nintendo's the publisher, and if they don't own the IP directly they own all the rights to all intents and purposes. Which means DRM is ultimately the decision of Nintendo not the game maker. If Nintendo said, "make multiple game saves happen" it would happen. If they simply don't give any direction on this it means they tacitly support this form of DRM, which is as worthy of criticism as any pther form of DRM. But it's Nintendo so they get a free pass on it. It really is one of the reasons I said "fug dis game". If I'd actually been able to play through the whole of Diamond without having to buy my own game, when my son already has it, I may have been very encouraging of (and maybe even contributed to) buying the next game, and the next and the next. As the financial powerhouse of my home I was put off and so I became negatively disposed towards future Pokemon purchases, which means no further Pokemon games have been purchased. |
That's a really bad reason to not buy any more Pokemon games. The reason they didn't start out with more than one file was because of limitations on the GameBoy. That's no excuse now, but if you both wanted to play it all the time, would you really want to share it. Again it's not an amazing reason, but there is some.