| Nicklesbe said: No equality would be giving them both the benefit of the doubt and looking at the facts for what they are. What you are describing is treating the man like a victem and treating the woman like a monster. That's not equality. |
He states he has been emotionally and mentally abused by her, citing her infidelity as one of the causes.
One of those instances of infidelity is confirmed indirectly by the one accused, and the girlfriend of another of the accused basically confirms the second count of infidelity in zoe's own response to the now-ex girlfriend of the guy she was accused of sleeping with.
So what we have here is 2 confirmed instances of infidelity out of 5.
Thus we have two confirmable instances where his claims of abuse are real - i'd say that pretty much solidifies his claims while taking that original benefit of doubt she was by default granted, and it no longer becomes an issue of if she should be doubted or not, and becomes an issue of a guy who has been abused, being ignored purely based on his gender, by people like you, who simply label him as "jealous, angry ex boyfriend".
And that, ladies and gentlemen, is the problem with the modern day approach to sexism.
