nahhhhhh

[Nicklesbe]

Tamron said:

Nicklesbe said:
WoW did neither of you read the kotaku post? She didn't use her body to get reviews. The case has been closed. She had a romantic relationship with a man and it was not for personal gain and she was single at the time. The rest is unfounded nonsense made up by other people, or the words of a pissed off and jealous ex boyfriend.

except,  you are being selectively forgetful of a stated timeline,  and that Nathan posts not only on kotaku but RPS too. 

Scrolling through zoe's interactions also shows communication between her and the girlfriend of one of the men she slept with. 

 

While it is indeed true who or how many people she slept with is nobodies business,  and frankly it doesnt really matter if those events occured just for sex or to further her own career,  it does not sanctify her actions,  especially given her outwardly vocal stance on the very things she has been accused,  and in most case been found undeniably guilty on. 

 

Of course,  if you believe a persons actions contradicting their carefully crafted public image is out of context then the issue is yours. 

 

Wether or not you like it,  the issue has been made public, and she has and continues to engage with people on the topic,  publicly,  thus the topic is debatable.  repeatedly decrying those doing just that and labeling anyone that doesn't agree with your stance as a misogynist or MRA flag-flier makes you no better than the very people you're labeling,  assuming they were even deserving of the label to begin with. 

but hey,  it's perfectly okay for you to make that call,  without any facts,  and without knowledge of that person,  but not okay for those you are labeling to do the same,  with detailed outlines of a persons actions which can in most cases be corroborated or confirmed. 

 

your double standards are for the most part,  very reflective of the current social justice trend. 

No I'm not being selective. I'm looking at actual facts, the real provable facts. You on the otherhand are focusing on the imagined ramblings of people in other forums and using that as evidence, even tho there is absolutly no proof any of it happened. Most of it has been taken down because again it was all slanderous BS. The one person in the industry she did have a relationship never made any reviews or did any stories about her game. Which disproves your theory. 

The fact that you guys continue to harp on about this, believing the lies of other people, ignoring facts, all so you can continue to bash her says a lot about you. I don't have any double standards, so far the only one with double standards is you. If a guy does this sort of thing you don't bat an eye but a woman does it you go on a crusade and ignore facts even after it's been disproven. I didn't label anyone without facts. I used their words and behavior towards the woman in question as evidence. If you come here and bash her and treat her like a monster and like some enemy that needs to be attacked instead of a human being, if you give the men invovled a free pass and even treat them like they were victems that were manipulated by her, and if you use the postings and words of others from MRA threads on reddit then guess what it's fair to say that person is a MRA and its not a double standard.

So you guys can either accept the facts as they have been proven or you can continue on this now even more baseless crusade to attack someone that frankly doesn't deserve it. It just makes you look bad.