| Nicklesbe said: WoW did neither of you read the kotaku post? She didn't use her body to get reviews. The case has been closed. She had a romantic relationship with a man and it was not for personal gain and she was single at the time. The rest is unfounded nonsense made up by other people, or the words of a pissed off and jealous ex boyfriend. |
except, you are being selectively forgetful of a stated timeline, and that Nathan posts not only on kotaku but RPS too.
Scrolling through zoe's interactions also shows communication between her and the girlfriend of one of the men she slept with.
While it is indeed true who or how many people she slept with is nobodies business, and frankly it doesnt really matter if those events occured just for sex or to further her own career, it does not sanctify her actions, especially given her outwardly vocal stance on the very things she has been accused, and in most case been found undeniably guilty on.
Of course, if you believe a persons actions contradicting their carefully crafted public image is out of context then the issue is yours.
Wether or not you like it, the issue has been made public, and she has and continues to engage with people on the topic, publicly, thus the topic is debatable. repeatedly decrying those doing just that and labeling anyone that doesn't agree with your stance as a misogynist or MRA flag-flier makes you no better than the very people you're labeling, assuming they were even deserving of the label to begin with.
but hey, it's perfectly okay for you to make that call, without any facts, and without knowledge of that person, but not okay for those you are labeling to do the same, with detailed outlines of a persons actions which can in most cases be corroborated or confirmed.
your double standards are for the most part, very reflective of the current social justice trend.
