Currently Online 
| walsufnir said:
My guess is that they didn't really had a chance to - EA most probably told them that they offered this to MS already so the service woudln't be unique to them. And they knew if they word it appropriately their fans and followers would easily adopt their opinion as they do nowadays like we can see in the media. |
So they didn't have a chance to say no because it was already offered to MS so wasn't unique to Sony? That's just confusing. Does Sony normally reject competing products from their console because they are not unique to them? Might explain the Tomb Raider situation. :P
What would Sony care anyway if they get a part of the income? Instead of them paying game developers a fee to have their games on PS+ Sony would be being paid essentially to have EA Access on PS4. Only real issue from having it is that due to competing interests, EA may say 'No' for games to be on PS+. Which brings us back to why Sony probably said no.
Hmm, pie.
