Smear-Gel said:
In the movie industry, denying pre-release reviews generally mean you expect it to review pretty poorly, and don't want those poor reviews dissuading people from getting it in the first place, but rather see the bad reviews after they pay for the movie. I see no reason to believe this isn't happening for the same reason. |
Well yes. The implications are always bad if you do it but it's not bad for consumers if a game is bad. They can just not buy it.
I see two kinds of gamers here. The ones that cannot wait for a game and want it so badly that they'll pay upfront or get it on day one. They obviously don't give a shit about reviews because they know they will like it regardless.
Then there are the ones that are not confident enough in the game that they need to see a review first. But does it matter when the review will be released? No. If they wanted the game badly they would get it on day one. If they need a review first, they can wait.
So I can't really think of a scenario where a post release review is hurting consumers.
If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.
