| padib said: This is what I'd like to get back to, this kind of thinking. I don't think town did right to forget the events of yesterday and I'm glad we're together in thinking that things happened yesterday that need to be remembered. Now that prof is at last addressing my doubts about him (why he was okay with Sparks for most of day 1 and his play on outlaw, as well as why he insisted on the experiment) I am getting a much better read on prof. It has nothing to do with the ad-hominems and everything to do with his explanations. Is that a feeling you also share? Now I'm really skeptical of Trucks. I am still very uneasy with him piggybacking on the plan to test my claim because it was very risky to play outlaw just to check my claim while we had no case on outlaw, as well as a waste of my ability (for the record I still have trouble for forgiving prof on it despite above paragraph). I feel like we need to continue pushing Sparks but I'm tired of beating a dead horse, I think we need to push Trucks for reasons on his motivations on Day 1. |
I wanted to prove your claim, plain and simple. "Lynching" outlaw provided that, a lot of discussion over whether we should do it or not, which to me is as good or maybe even better as discussion over the lynching another random townie because in the end we didn't lose a townie (provided Outlaw is town, of course). Also, you're the one who wasted your ability, no one else.
Signature goes here!
