| theprof00 said: It wasn't an experiment hylian. I promise you that pretending to be a power that is now vanilla is a typical scum tactic. whether or not you believe me, thats up to you. what matters right now is that were roughly three good reads up in this game against mafia. myself, padib, outlaw are likely all town, I cant speak for them but I know I am and you should too. the more we can confirm, the tighter the noose feels around mafia. I didnt go after sparks yesterday because I knew if I did, I'd probably just have another person push in my lynch. I kept an eye out for him and that is all. Now that im more comfortable, I feel I can go after him. that doesn't mean im scum. Im town who saw the possibility of being mislynch if I made too many enemies. |
It was too an experiment, you just said so right afterwards in the same post. You claim you didn't think he was town and that you wanted to confirm with an experiment, using outlaw as the guinea pig. You say padib is likely town now, but you wouldn't be saying that if you hadn't had your way with that experiment. On the other hand, several other people were willing to believe padib, including myself and outlaw. You keep saying outlaw is confirmed because he was a coward, but that's the opposite of what you said yesterday, when you tried to get outlaw to vote for himself, saying that's what town would do because it would be a one-for-one trade of town to mafia, and as much as I hated the experiment because I believed padib's claim and didn't want his power wasted, I did have to admit that it made sense for outlaw to vote for himself by your logic. Outlaw's not voting for himself is a count against him, as you originally claimed. I still think he's town that just made a mistake there, but I don't see him as nearly confirmed as town as padib is right now. You on the other hand are contradicting yourself with outlaw. You voted for him with little reasoning, then didn't change the vote when momentum was winding down on him, forcing padib to use his power to save outlaw and reduce momentum further, which you in turn used as an excuse to stay on outlaw. Then today you say you think outlaw is innocent for the very reasons you claimed yesterday would support that he was guilty, and I think you're just doing so because people think he's innocent and you want to earn townie points by claiming his innocence too, but you want to do so without seeming like you're changing for no reason so you're coming up with a bullshit reason to switch.
And how the hell would going after Sparks yesterday have put you in danger? He almost got hammered yesterday! I was one of the only people pushing your lynch yesterday. If you'd given up with your stupid experiment, Sparks would have been lynched yesterday, and there'd have been no consequence for you. Unless of course you're on a team with him. But no, the reason you didn't go after Sparks yesterday was because you wanted to test padib's claim. If he's as stupid as you think he is, and you think it would be stupid for town to reveal what he revealed, you should have just trusted his claim, and gone after an actual lead yesterday, of which we had several. If you agreed with what several people said about his decision to reveal, namely that doing so was to ensure that he would get to keep his power, like myself, padib of course, and I believe Nickles and outlaw all did, then you'd have trusted his claim and gone after an actual lead. And don't give me that "it was our only chance to test it!" crap, because he claimed he'd keep his power, so we'd have a chance to test it later, when expending it would serve an actual purpose! You should have trusted padib, both based on logic and your own knowledge of how padib plays, but you didn't! And now, you're attacking him, because you're scared of him. You're attacking and creating confusion and paranoia, and it's pissed off several people, including myself, pabid, outlaw, and Cone. You don't seem to be thinking like a town either. You're using semantics, confusion, and paranoia to manipulate the battlefield and twist people's words to make them look guilty, rather than using logic and synergy to figure out who actually seems guilty.
