| Nicklesbe said: No way is he serious. Padib has been thoughtful and concise all game why would he spring this now unless he had an ulterior motive? Prof made some good points earlier and as I said before if you wanted to make a serious case against sparks I would consider it. From theprofs findings and what you've said so far I am willing to support your vote and back your play again. This is my vote in stone. It will not change. *snip* |
This just makes you look suspicious, just tagging along with anyone and everyone. All you seem to do is bandwagon. I had you as town on my list, just brushing some of the more suspicious stuff off as justNoobyThings, but now I'm not so sure. The only thing I will say, and can say I guess, is, please reconsider. Try reading me and prof's back and forth again, maybe.
The underlined, not sure what to say to either of those.
