By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

NOTE: Please do not comment on the likelyhood of a scenario, just if you think I am missing some piece of the puzzle or you disagree with a conclusion.

>>Scenarios were RCTjunkie is telling the truth:

1. Multi-faction scum:
In support: Two attacks happened at night.
Against: It wouldn't make sense to attack RCTjunkie.
Conclusions: 1. We have two factions. One targeted prof, and the other targeted RCTjunkie.
2. RCT and prof may or may not be scum (mafia or SK).

2. Bus driver & another killing party:
In support: Two attacks happened at night.
It wouldn't make sense to attack RCTjunkie.
Against:
Nobody has claimed anything.
Conclusions: 1. We have a (maybe town) bus driver and another killing party (mafia/SK/Vig).
2. Driver bussed someone with RCTJunkie, saving their life.
3. 
RCT and prof may or may not be scum.

3. Thief:
In support: RCT never explicitly said he was attacked.
Our abilities have come from our items so far.
Against: Nobody has claimed anything.
Conclusions: 1. We have a thief.
2. Only one attack last night = no SK. Poisoner still possible.
3. prof and RCTjunkie are definitely town.

>>Scenarios were RCTjunkie is lyng about everything:

1. One scum faction:
In support: We only had one attack last night (remember RCT is lying here).
Against: I can't think of anything.  He cuold easily be lying.
Conclusions: 1. We have one faction.
2. prof is 
definitely town, since he's last nights only victim. Poisoner still possible.
3. RCTjunkie may or may not be town, but is scummy for lying.

>>RCTjunkie is only lyng about losing his bulletproof:

1. One scum faction again (turned out exactly like above):
In support: We only had one attack last night (remember RCT is lying here).
Against: I can't think of anything. He cuold easily be lying.
Conclusions: 1. We have one faction.
2. prof is 
definitely town, since he's last nights only victim. Poisoner still possible.
3. RCTjunkie may or may not be town, but is scummy for lying.