Suppose a game has DLC released for it a year later. Should the game win GOTY in that year just because it's now got new content? A remake or remaster that only adds a bit of new content should fall into this category.
However, if a game receives DLC that is practically a whole new game, that DLC, and thus the game it's attached to, should entirely be considered for GOTY.
So I say that it should be the new content that is judged. Most remasters add little new content, and thus shouldn't be in the running. Remakes, on the other hand, sometimes make significant changes. I wouldn't consider Wind Waker HD to be worth considering. I'd consider Pokemon Heart Gold and Soul Silver to be borderline at best. I'd consider Mario 64 DS to be in the running, but I wouldn't consider it good enough to win (not enough new content). I'd consider Goldeneye 007 Wii to be a serious contender (if the game itself is good enough) because despite being essentially a remake, it was extensively changed.
Existing User Log In
New User Registration
Register for a free account to gain full access to the VGChartz Network and join our thriving community.
