Nothing but hunches?
Let me run you through the events again.
you came in sayingsomeone with a vest might've been attacked.
rct confirms. According to you now, you simply meant that no double kill wouldnt necessarily mean no second attack, that there couldve been another or a different vest. You did not consider the claimed doc, as i just pointed out.
you continued to believe rcts vest until i suspected you for doing so, where you then said "hey wait why do we believe rct?"
You then say that you didnt mean multiple vests just that rct doesnt have one.
i figure rct might not even be attacked but simply lost his vest or that it was stplen.
You actually think this is an option, despite saying earlier that you didnt believe rct even has a vest.
y
Essay Pro