By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
o_O.Q on 15 August 2014
Edit Thread
DaveyBoy88 said:
o_O.Q said:
 

 

one only has to look at the boer wars and other examples to understand what europeans brought to africa and perpetuate to this day in terms of violence


You have no idea what you are talking about. But that's ok, keep ignoring the real history and eat up what they tell you about the poor Africans.

http://www.voortrekker-history.co.za/massacre_great_trek.php#.U-4VuXL8hlc

Those boers wanted peace. You go and do your research. But their leaders were slain in cold blood while attempting a treaty. Some of your points may be correct, but don't be as gullible as everyone about how nothing is the "poor African's" fault.

You conveniently ignore the massacre of blacks by blacks. Rwanda is a telling (recent - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rwandan_Genocide) example, but there are many more. One must also come to the inevitable conclusion that most of the most heinous crimes will never be known of due to the lack of a tradition of keeping historical data.

i'm not really sure what your point is about the boer wars so i have no comment the point at the end of the day is that its an example of baseless violence perpetuated against africans by europeans 

you have a situation where people are invading your land and putting sanctions against you... are you really telling me that that is in anyway justifiable? lol if thats the road you're going down then i can only conclude you've already taken a massive leap off the deep end

 

how is violence of blacks against blacks relevent in any way to the point i  made? in fact let me ask you do you even understand the point the point i was making?

there has been genocide of europeans by europeans so???? how does it apply to the point made????

 

"One must also come to the inevitable conclusion that most of the most heinous crimes will never be known of due to the lack of a tradition of keeping historical data"

yes i absolutely agree with you there as they say the victors or the ones who run things determine what information is dsitributed to the public and in this case who runs things?

and as a result who is the record of history going to favor?

is it really likely to favor the african point of view when europeans were the victors? i'll let that cook in your head for a while