Fire Emblem Mafia - Game Thread - Concluded

[Nicklesbe]

RCTjunkie said:

TruckOSaurus said:

theprof00 said:

Just clarifying a couple things for you...factually.

3. Let's see, he was close to being lynched, claimed that role thinking that he was already dead (unlikely), and then suddenly was not in danger of being lynched. Whether A triggered B is not certain, but what is certain is that he very likely could've been lynched had he kept his mouth shut. Motive is unknown.
4. Why share that he lost it is a good question.

RCT is a very good candidate for a lynch today.

 

3. That's not exactly how I remember it. When RCT popped back in the thread we were already deep into the debate about testing padib's claim. RCT escaping the noose was mostly due to the efforts to have padib's power proven, his claim was far from the focus of the discussion that ended up saving him.

4. That is a good question indeed. @RCT: Care to answer it when you come back?

Woah! Lots of exciting things happening while I was gone. I appreciate Truck defending me (or at least playing devil's advocate) while I was gone.

For your question, my initial role reveal yesterday was because I honestly had zero hope. I saw the tides shifting against me, so I figured the rest of the town deserved all the information that I could give (which at that point was simply my role). I also want to point out that I suspected Wright and thought conegamer was genuine as I thought it might help discuss different areas not discussed before.

Now why I decided to reveal myself today is because I believe information can be power, and since the person that tried to kill me would try extra hard to make sure I was lynched afterwards and have their efforts not be in vain, I decided to get the upper hand and reveal what had happened first. 

Now let me give my thoughts on what has happened so far in regards to my reveal and the aftermath (feel free to correct me):

 

• noname points out that there must be either 2 mafia groups or one group and a crazy murderer. 
• prof00 immediately disbelieves my claims and analyzes what other scenarios may have happened, agressively trying to persecute me. No one questions that his being saved story is accurate (even if it was, it doesn't rule him as a townie per se unless spurge knew ahead of time)(again, correct me if I'm wrong. I don't want to put anyone on trial until I'm off the bench)
• Nicklesbe also questions the likliness that I would be lying and goes for most logical scenarios that the mafia would go for, communicating with prof00 and TruckOSaurus amongst others to figure out all scenarios possible. 
• TruckOSaurus presents plausable alternatives to prof and Nick as to why I would be innocent.
• Everyone else is either looking at other people or are not suspicious enough to ask me questions or question my testimony at this point.

Also, it's important to note that it wasn't a bulletproof vest that saved me, but a beaststone. It's very specific for a very specific reason. 

 

Isn't white eagle on vacaction? RCT thanks for answering. Tho there were some questions of mine you did not answer and now there seem to be some inconsistancies I hope you can help me reconcile. Forgive me if I am mistaken but why did you have zero hope? As Truck pointed in the quote when you revealed your claim most of the votes were on outlaw and we were discussing proving Padib's claim. At the time you had a great deal of hope, and no aparrent reason to reveal that claim other than to seemingly gloat that you wouldn't be murdered during the night. However that is simply what I saw and I have been wrong before and I don't discount the possibility I could be wrong again. I don't want to make the mistake of tunneling on you like I did with Theprof, however my questions ultimatly lead me to believe he is town. So this will likely be my last line of questions of you for now. I would much rather be looking for someone that may be a magic user.  If I have learned anything since day one it's that the truth always comes out and lies, mistakes, errors in judgment do not stick.

You said you descided to get the upperhand. When exactly did you descide to do that? Was it the night before? Was it this morning? What caused you to make that descision and ultimatly reveal that you had been attacked? Also when the votes were on you, why did you give up? Theprof and sparks at the time were starting to make good points to vote for outlaw instead? You said you wanted town to win so why not fight as theprof did and as sparks did? The truth always comes out and in retrospect it looks more like you gave up and lost hope because you knew you were guilty and were caught. Please note I'm not making any judgments, I'm not even voting yet. Simply making observations and if those observations are wrong then I hope theprof, sparks, padib, trucks, and smeags can help clear that up. Also i was just wondering, why didn't you put your vote back on outlaw? What was the reason you kept your vote off and open in the end?

Perhaps you missed it but I did question whether or not TheProf was telling the truth about being attacked and being protected by spurg. From the falvor text it is most likely that spurge did die protecting someone. I'll ask again, what is the possibility that WoW would word the flavor in that way if spurg was just attacked and not protecting someone? No one else has claimed they were protected, and spurges flavor death indicates he was protecting someone so until someone else says they were protected I find it unlikely theprof was lying. Also for all those that have more experiance with WoW games, has WoW ever made mistakes before with lore? Is there precident to believe that the beaststone error was because WoW screwed up lore, or is it more likely that RCT may have confused his possible fake claim?