MoHasanie said:
We'll never know how much MS paid them. MS will probably market the game heavily though like they do with every exclusive so that will save SE a lot of money. I doubt MS paid them $100m though since its just timed, so maybe you're right about it being a bad deal for SE. |
The 100M I said isn't about money changing hands. But all the points of the article... Smaller royalty fee, marketing, ms engineers, money to develope, etc. Because there isn't only the lost sales for this game but also some image tarnishing that could damper sequels or even other games from SE. Fanboys can be bitter.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."