By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
LogicMaster on 13 August 2014
Edit Thread
VanceIX said:
LogicMaster said:


You keep saying that, but don't have proof that Sony payed to keep anything off the Xbox. It is just a weak tactic you keep using to defend this obvious crappy move by MS.That is a fact that MS paid to keep this game from releasing same time on PS.There are no facts that Sony paid to keep anything off the Xbox, just because the games released forst on PS2 (which was way bigger than the Xbox) and it made sense for developers to put games exclusively on PS2.Also GTA had no association with Xbox the way TR has with PS.So it would not be the same if they did pay for it, as MS paid for Bioshock, ME, Gears,Dead Rising and many more which were never released on PS and no one complained. The fact is that you lost this argument and can not admit that.Let it go.

So, uh, do have any concrete proof that Microsoft paid SE to keep TR off the PS4?

Exactly. 

Anyway, there's lierally 0 substance to the argument of an alt. Later.

Are you serious? Phil Spencer just said it in his interview.

"It’s a deal between us and the partner. People ask me how much did we pay. There are certain things I’m just not going to talk about because it’s a business deal between us and then. Obviously the deal does have a duration."
Read more at http://gematsu.com/2014/08/rise-tomb-raider-xbox-exclusivity-duration-xbox-boss-confirms#Lv9Rt9fAOkdswBGZ.99

 

LOL! Obviously MS paid for it since it was announced for PS/PC.Stop being delerious. I should not have to explain logic to you.There is no other reason to announce the game for PS/PC and then say it's exclusive for the launch to xbox systems.A business deal means money exchanged hands.End of discussion.What's an alt anyway?