|
overman1 said: Ready at Dawn is a SECOND PARTY DEVELOPER NOT THIRD PARTY!!!!! the project was also done together with SANTA MONICA STUDIOS A EFFFING FIRST PARTY. BOTH BLOODBORNE AND THE ORDER ARE SONY OWNED IPS FUNDED AND HELPED DEVELOPED BY SONY FIRST PARTY DEVELOPERS (SJS AND SMS RESPECTIVELY) BUNGIE WAS NEVER A FIRST PARTY STUDIO FOR MS. THEY WERE SECOND PARTY JUST LIKE READY AT DAWN IS TO SONY. Ready at Dawn WHO HAS NEVER MAKE ANY GAME FOR ANY OTHER SYSTEM BUT THE PS BRAND. where are you getting all these freaking lies? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Order:_1886 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bloodborne
In 1997, many developers (most notably Square Soft) move from Nintendo to Sony BECAUSE OF THE EFFING CD FORMAT WHICH WAS CHEAPER AND EASIER TO CODE FOR THAN NINRENDO'S CARTRIDGE FORMAT FOR THE N64. That is Nintedo's fault not Sony's. maybe you need to go do some serious research before you come here with your lies and overtly baised opinions. God damn...atleast try to make your bullshit convincing
|
#1 I know I said I was done, but your anger is ridiculous. Calm down, go have a Coke and a smile. No one has been rude or hostile or demeaning to you.
#2 who fucking cares about formats and blah blah. If it were such an easy and obvious thing that Eidos would abandon Sega and Nintendo consoles, there would be no reason for Sony to pay for a console exclusive agreement. Yep, these console exclusive moneyhats date all the way back to Sony in the 90's LOL.
So you can keep arguing that Tomb Raider released on no other consoles because DUH NINTEDNDO SUX and I will just keep pointing to links about Sony's exclusive deal and ask why If you gave an order that Santiago wasn't to be touched, and your orders are always followed, then why would Santiago be in danger? Why would it be necessary to transfer him off the base?
