Why is moneyhatting frowned upon?

[GamingGamer]

Chromeo said:
As has been said, it's frowned upon for various reasons. It is simply paying a company to not allow that game on competing platforms.

Usually it's just an annoyance for the people that can't play the game on the rival console, which is usually the case with new IP's or reboots of a franchise.

In the case of Rise of the Tomb Raider, this is a game that is a direct sequel (prequel) to a version that was completely multiplatform. In fact, they JUST came out with a version of said game months ago. It would be like the next Assassin's Creed game being announced as fully exclusive to PlayStation platforms or the like.

It irritates me how people ignore this fact.If MS bought it like Gears or funded and published it than that is understandable.Announcing it for other platforms and deciding to hold the games back because MS paid you is trash period.Why is it tht hard to grasp?The game is still in development for PS/PC,but now they will get a delayed release.How can anyone defend that BS tactic? So people should not be upset about a game being announced for multiple platforms and then getting shelved in favor of one?