Double Standards Much?

[Zod95]

VanceIX said:

Zod95 said:

AC's annual releases pointed out by Miguel_Zorro and the cross-gen releases mentioned by you are in fact different things but in the end they converge to the same issue (cash-grabbing through game recycling). You are very keen of establishing the difference and go after who mixes the points (which is not useful in any way) while totally ignoring who doesn't and shows you that TLoU is actually a different case (I did it here: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=6569021).

Clearly you don't want to understand the situation and you don't want your questions to get answered. You just want to bash anybody that dares to complain about Assassin's Creed.

No, I'm not bashing anyone here. I've kept things civil, in no way have I attacked anyone.

And complaining about Assassins' Creed isn't the point of the thread. The point of the thread was comparing the marketing strategy of the two latest titles to a similar marketing strategy by Sony.

Any dislike for the series would be best discussed elsewhere.

Not explicitly but, in a way, you have been rude to people that tried to help getting your questions answered. You should be nice to them instead of despising their effort and telling them "go bash it elsewhere" or "you didn't bother reading the posts" or "you can think what you want, I really don't care".

You could have created a positive environment, valuing any honest contribution to the debate (even if you don't agree with it) and treating with respect all the participants in the discussion. Instead, you just impolitely rejected any arguments that weren't convenient to you but in a way that you could "keep things civil" (pretty much like politicians do).

And, again, you totally ignore my initial post (which addressed exactly what you wanted). You have already the answer to your question. You just don't know what to do with it.