| overman1 said: I have been following the conversation and have noticed you hopping from one point to another. This isnt the first time you and I argued about this. Like I said you keep stating opinions as facts. Not everyone values Sony exclusives more than Nintendo or vice visa. About the frame per sec issue; Sony never came out to say ALL thier games are LOCKED at 60 fps. most of them are CONSISTENT at 60 and at the very most drops to 45Fps when thier is a lot going on on screen (this is still the first year of this gen). There is no Xbox one game right now that is CONSISTENTLY 60fps even Titanfall dropped framerates sometimes (rarely) to around 55 or 50 (even though the resolution is 792p) and it has the best framerates next gen. SO should All 60pfs games on Xbox not identify as this because they are not locked on 60fps? Everyone knows PC native resolution and framerates are the best but PC dont have Xbox exclusives (maybe some of them) and it MIGHT never have PS4 exclusives neither Nintendo exclusives. That is why I own a PS4 because I love thier exclusives which would never be on a PC. |
He can't be reasoned with.. He forgets he is the one who went off tangent generalizing the majority with a minority opinion (especially with such a weak 2 page ign thread) and making PC vs ps4 comparisons.. Then he has the audacity arguing semantics when the ps4 is the most capable next gen console currently available while assuming somehow console gamers are envious of RTS, MOBAs, and MMOs... All starting with an argument about TLOUR being anti consumerism, ps4 owners being disappointed with and influx of indies and even more disappointed in less emphasis of AAA on a gen cycle less than a year in..
Like you said.. Hopping from one thing to another grasping every straw man argument under the sun hoping his argument and overgeneralization makes any sense.. Yup.. Makes sense alrighty.. Lol.
Man.. I hate it when your girl has to leave my place to come back to you..
