Fire Emblem Mafia - Game Thread - Concluded

[Nicklesbe]

Sparks said:

padib said:

Because the investigation made on RCT was made by town together.

Your vote on outlaw was made badly, you admitted it yourself (I have nothing on outlaw).

And again, it's a typical scum tactic to cry over spoiled milk. If town was wrong, it's possible because we have nothing else but deduction to work with and deduction is not foolproof.

Are we going to pretend this never happened?

You see, Nickles?

On the other hand, if we do the tactic, we might gain some actual concrete info.

I'm not saying you should do it, but just watch out for padib in the future.

I understand that and I am considering everything. This is not an easy descision and I'm not taking it lightly. I have no reason to test the tactic, so far Padib has been the only one that has seemed to be straight with me the whole time. Maybe he is playing me but he hasn't given me much if any reason to think he is lying, if is I'll find out later. I also don't like the idea of voting for outlaw without a concrete reason or the very least a strong case against him. So far the only real reason you guys use to vote for him is the actions of someone else. That just doesn't cut it, it's outlaw's head on the line not padibs. If you want a vote for Padib fine, make that case and I'll consider it. So far all I can do is look at the strongest case available and that is RCT's guilt which despite your previous claims is much more than just inactivity. Right now I am relooking over the cases made for both. I am not going to take Padib's claims into consideration when looking at the claims made of outlaws guilt because they do not and should not have any relavence to it. Outlaws guilt or innocence is the only thing that matters when considering a vote for him and trying to make it about padib when it's not is not a good case and it feels like you don't really care about the vote or for outlaws life. You just care about proving Padib wrong, which is not a good reason to kill someone.