| binary solo said: Will people be calling this a great deal when they're paying $200 per year for 6 or 7 publisher subscriptions? PS Now starts to look a lot better when compared to paying $30 per year per publisher as opposed to only EA. |
But, why would anyone subscribe to 6 or 7 publishers? Sure, there could be 6, 7 or 10 subscriptions, but it's highly unlikely that people would see that much value in all of them.
I see value in EA, I buy and play their sports games every year, they have some goid games outside sports (Peggle, BF, Dragon Age, Mass Effect and many many more). This subscription is good for me.
I wouldn't see value in Activision's offer, they really don't attract me much.
Ubisoft, maybe I would subscribe to 3 months at a time to play a few games I'm interested in.
Square Enix, nothing for me but Tomb Raider, no subscription for me..
Etc, etc...
Different people have different tastes, and those subscriptions would cater to them personally. So, for $30 you get games you like, instead of current $50 for PS+ or $60 for XBL Gold for a promenade of games you have a fleeting interest in.
It would be great if all publishers did this, giving us plenty of choices to pick from, and then picking thise we see value in.
