By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Dr.Henry_Killinger said:
starcraft said:

Fine, I'll bite. What do you claim was a 'factual error?'

Bearing in mind you've just invoked facts, meaning provable beyond all doubt.

Everything is a bit of an exaggeration

Is it an exaggeration? Your description of the RSX was more an exaggeration than any of my descriptions. "Anemic"? Not even close. The RSX was only outcalssed by the 360 due to the eDRAM. Other than that, it actually had better performance in many tasks.

And the way games look might be subjective, but 90%+ people would never notice a difference in real life, unlike the 360/PS3 fiasco where PS3 multiplatform games were consistently worse, and blatantly noticeable at that. The vast majority of people don't see the difference between 900p and 1080p, especially if the 900p is upscaled well, but people could easily tell the difference between the 360 and PS3 version, especially in the first 3 or 4 years of last gen. 

So yes, it's subjective, but it's an opinion that the majority of people who just play games for fun share.



                                                                                                               You're Gonna Carry That Weight.

Xbox One - PS4 - Wii U - PC