| theprof00 said: Tomato, potato, hylian. you can say you didnt do any of those things for the reasons I provided but you can't PROVE that you didnt. The opportunity to do exactly what I said does exist. It IS possible. you haven't gone after a single other player. Ive question 8. Im looking at everything, and you have tunnel vision. Naturally the simple strategy is to find out as much about everyone and every post as you can because a townie knows nothing about anything. Every post is a chance to find scum. When you do something unnatural, however, it says theres a hidden agenda. You're being unreasonable. Unreasonable people generally have an agenda. The solution ive offered FITS even if maybe its not true, its possible, likely, and classic mafia strategy to act the way you have. It doesnt PROVE you're mafia, no But you're not going to just talk it away. See how that works both ways? |
I do see how that works both ways. And I did go after some other players, but I can only vote for one. I went after the silent players, and early on I raised suspicion to Nickles. After I had decided on a vote, I continued to pursue leads for the next day. Hence why I talked about outlawauron as my next vote, and even said I'd vote for him if there was a tie, so as to at least accomplish something. It wouldn't be just jumping on a bandwagon in that case, because I do also genuinely suspect outlawauron. Who either forget this thread exists or is trying way too hard to hide now, so I definitely suspect him. IkePoR and RTC are next on my suspicion list, and they'd be higher, but I don't know what to make of them. No one has really pursued them that hard, and RTC and Ike have both responded a little, while outlawauron has been very silent and very dodgy when he does respond. I maintain that based on outlaw's behavior outside of this mafia thread, it fits him very well, but I also realize he's very suspicious and he's next on my list.
