Fire Emblem Mafia - Game Thread - Concluded

[HylianSwordsman]

theprof00 said:

lot to go over in this post so I'll bullet for easier reading.
1. There's plenty of ways to enjoy the theme without vapidity. Some games people use quotes from the source under their posts. Other games, people talk in character. Sometimes people use references as their metaphors. But one thing is certain. We are in a game where we were never told we couldn't name our characters. We were also told that mafia have names, and also additional fake-names they can use. We were also told that faction alignment means nothing, and that characters don't match night actions. What is the result? People hinting at their characters names. What's the point? Sure it's fun to play your character....the point is why is everyone only "hinting" at their character? Why are people making post after post about something so inconsequential?

2. At this point I wrote a few paragraphs but realized that your accusations are completely baseless, so instead insert a line about steel swords if you will.

3. Perhaps I said that flavor conversations are bad for town, but perhaps that's too harsh. Flavor is fine....in moderation. If all I see out of one person is all flavor, then that looks bad.

4. Tell me in what way the flavor has pushed forward anything? It's a fun side-quest. Nothing more. In fact, the only reason you are having a somewhat contributory debate is because I'm here.

5. Look, I'm not telling you what to do. Do whatever you want. Just...for the record, I don't think you're mafia. It would be far too stupid to pick a fight with me on day 1 if you were. And your shameless flipflopping on activity vs inactivity is begging for votes.

In fact, I'm going to make a quick tally of all the inconsistencies you've said. Feel free to do the same for me, if you choose. cont next post.

It's simple really. The thing about inactivity vs activity was because I wanted more people's input. My initial intuition was that you seemed suspicious, for the reasons I've said. Someone already tallied up the activity and you're the most active by a landslide, with almost no flavor posts, almost all accusations. But others, including yourself, voiced that inactivity was the suspicious thing, so I decided that since I'm inexperienced, there might be something to it I'm missing, so I decided to ask for the logic behind that. I was basically asking you for your defense without addressing you directly, because after all, you weren't the only active one, just the most active one. But really, the question was for you. And you answered it. You have nothing. I was waiting because I'm new to this and was hoping for some insight from more experienced players. What insight did I get? Well, your insight was that I should have a backbone. So I will. My initial opinion, before I began to doubt myself, was that you were suspicious. I doubted myself because of inexperience, but this experience this game requires isn't necessarily with the game itself, just with reading people and putting two and two together, which I can do just fine.

I've regained my confidence. I think you're scum. Nolan was probably your fake claim. Also your posts are long, distracting, and I agree with some of what other people have said that your excessive activity has given too many people a chance to hide as well as draw attention to only what you want attention drawn to. And your playstyle just pisses me off. I've said it before, all the rhetoric and semantics, so annoying. This isn't an Ace Attorney themed mafia game. I definitely think you're scum, but even if you're not scum, you're bad for the town, and you're kind of ruining the fun for me.

 

Vote for theprof00

 

Sorry guys, I was too busy to check in yesterday. There's way too much to respond to now, so give me a bit to process all this.