| Nicklesbe said: You've already argued that point. You've been proven wrong for the seond time about people claming up. Some people have obviously clammed up which again I have shown. You've already debated the damning evidence. It's already been done. Your arguments were evasive, dishonest and pretty much bullshit. You just admited that you tried to goad someone into saying RCT wasn't a noob. it doesn't matter if it was RCT or someone else I was still right because you were trying to goad someone into getting into a debate with you, and you just admitted it. You still lied which is damning. You knew he wasn't a noob yet you called him one anyway. It's damning because it's manipulative and dishonest. You wanted someone to say he wasn't a noob so you could get them in an argument like you are doing now so you could manipulate them, twist their words and get what ever you could to shift guilt on them. However it backfired, no one fell for it. Instead RCT called you out and put you on the list. If you havn't noticed other people did notice. It makes sense that you slipped up. Since it wasn't the first and won't be the last. That's probably why you rarely make it to day 2 as you said. So I'm done. I have no desire to waste anymore time on this. You've given me the impression that you are an incredibly dishonest and manipulative person. You've done nothing to allieviate that impression and your arguments have fallen short. I've tried to keep an open mind I have tried to get a fresh start with you. Instead you keep trying to rehash old debates, you keep pushing me, and trying to manipulate me. I don't have time for it. I said my piece on it, you said your piece on it now I'm moving on. |
proven wrong twice? I guess we both have diff definitions for proof. You saying something from YOUR POV doesn't make it proven.
You haven't allowed me any debate. I rebutted your long post, and you have not responded to a single one. You've only called them evasive. You honestly don't care what I have to say. What are you afraid of? Let's go through them one by one. C'mon I'm right here.
I wanted to see if anyone knew. Why? Because let's just imagine that RCT is mafia. And let's just imagine that they all introduced themselves in their mafia chat, which is typical to have several posts about behavior and history, etc...similar to how people introduced themselves in the thread with how experienced they were. I wanted to see if somehow Anyone might have known that RCT wasn't a noob. I was hoping that someone would come forward and say RC doesn't belong. I honestly didn't expect him to show up himself.
Oh.. you already knew that! Wow, you're pretty smart...or did I explain that already? I'm not sure. That's quite an awfully accurate knowledge of what my plan was...well aside from the manipulating and getting them into an argument. See, you just assume a future that never happened with no real basis based on past occurence. But I can show you one: It's when I lied to Ike, and told him contrarian information. I caught him lying about keeping up with the game. But did I twist his words? Did I accuse him of being scum? Did I even FoS him? Nope. Why? Because I only do this to learn about how people are thinking. I'm not trying to push random lynches on people who make mistakes. That's not my style. My style is to, by the end of my gametime, have a list of 4-5 people as suspects and be as close as possible. All I'm looking for is evidence.
You are an incredibly stubborn person. I will now post the results of the post count pre and post prof. Enjoy them.
