By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DirtyP2002 said:

care to explain how?

Well the opening does state that the 360 while profitable sold less, so that means that while having less profits from sales also has less losses from production so the loss of profits is less then the lost of production proyected by the 360. Wich means that the x1 is responsible for a lot more of the increase in production cost while responsible for a lot less of the profit. So that means that the x1 has missed a lot more than $400m. Since the sells for the x1 have been more than triple the 360 I belive and the x1 cost a lot more to produce than the 360, I can Inmagine the the cost of production of the x1 to be around 4/5 out of the total, So the x1 is responsible for almost the entire increase in cost so the x1 is responsible for more than just $400, I say over $1billion.

Again, this dosent mean that is loosing money, just that there is less profit. So they could still be profitable, wich I doubt, but we canot jump to conclusion.



It takes genuine talent to see greatness in yourself despite your absence of genuine talent.