Nicklesbe said:
I wasn't aware that it was even possible to remove a vote once it's been cast. I don't agree with Khan's vote, at least his stated reason for it. It's good reason to suspect him but it alone isn't enough to vote him.I understan RCT's vote, prof lied and called him a noob when he knew well that he wasn't. Even when you are a noob you don't want to be called a noob and if you are as experianced as RCT I imagine being called a noob is crossing a very serious line. There is a better way to get a responce and lying and using insults is shady and not constructive. I thought I made my reasons very clear in my post. He lied, manipulated, obfuscated, and had some substantial slips. His responses to those accusations came off as evasive and dishonest. It was by no means an easy descision but I had to listen to my gut. I'm not exactly sure why you are defending him. To me it's obvious but then I am inexperianced. I agree he shouldn't be voted for no good reason. I do find it suspicious tho. Not FOS or HOS suspiscious but I'll definitly be keeping a closer eye. |
WHo has clammed up around me? THe most active players are ones I've talked to.
You
Padib
ikepor
sparks
Spurge
THe only ones who have clammed up are
White eagle
Hylian (after I accused him)
DO you think it's just coincidental that the people I talk to start talking?
People clam up around me?
You couldn't prove that statement to me even if you had the entire game to do so.
But again, please feel free to bring up each problem you have with me, one by one, and allow me the opportunity to prove you wrong.. because it's easily done. It will just take time.
Lastly, again, I don't believe RCT really is convinced I'm mafia.