By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
noname2200 said:
padib said:

What do you think of Sparks' play? I like how he brings up links and rereads posts, I think that's very townie. But, the case that the less active players are mafia is an easy one to make for a new mafia. Would you agree?


He's certainly low on the list at the moment. Not because of the links and reposts per se, but because there are more suspicious characters out there in my opinion.

theprof00 said:

I'm pretty sure both questions have been answered in my posts. Maybe they haven't been directed at you, but they're out there.

I'll confess I've already reached the point where I'm often skimming your posts: they are numerous, often long, and occasionally rambling. No offense intended, of course.

Shall I spare you and repeat myself then?

You asked why I thought negatively about outlaw. I answered by asking outlaw if he's gotten around to looking into sparks. I thought poorly of him because he said he would do something and didn't follow through. I was suspicious of fake-activity. He comes back to say he knows sparks previous alt. That's confirmation of fake-activity. Instead of simply telling you, I gave you the opporunity to look at what I was looking at. I'm guessing you didn't bother...just like you didn't bother to read my posts that also explained this already.

Second question was about confirmation but non-confirmation of day talk.

I'm assuming this was in reference to Ike. I'm not sure what was so hard to figure out. A person who claimed to be following along doesn't correct me on known information....twice even.