"I suppose he's suspicious though, so FOS for nicklesbe then."
You take my lead on what I worked for. Then later turn around and HoS me too.
"been a day of real time and you've already accused enough people I'm losing track."
I've asked questions to nickles and sparks and eagle. And I followed by saying sparks and eagle were likely town. One person isn't a lot to keep track of. Try ginseng, I heard it's a miracle for memory.
"You clearly have something to hide."
Ah, the 'talking a lot is hiding something' line
"You're either a mafia trying to lead the lynch mob or you're a trigger happy fool with a silver tongue. Either way, I'm thinking the town might be better off without you."
Classic lynch bait. NO MATTER WHAT I AM, I AM A DANGER. Even if I turn up town, we surely can't blame anyone for the mislynch right? I mean...he accused so many people it made my head spin. Clearly a loose cannon.
"Hand of suspicion Prof"
What got no backbone? If town is so much better off without me....then you must want to push for my lynch, right? Guess not.
"but I tend to take a more aggressive role in these kinds of games"
And yet you condemn me for mine?
"My initial thought was that the extremely active fingerpointers on the first day seemed suspicious, but several seasoned players seem to be saying it's the quiet ones you need to worry about."
Change of heart because others seem to be disagreeing with you?
"Because I feel like it could just as easily be a townie that doesn't know their character and has no insights to offer."
Ah so quiet people just don't have anything to talk about because they don't know their character. Here's a thought...why not play this game? It's loads of fun.
" That said, whether IkePoR has played before or not, his username suggests he's pretty into FE, so he probably does know his character, so maybe he has no excuse to be quiet. Or maybe I'm just reading into it too much."
Maybe, maybe not, blah blah blah
"You have to bold your votes. No editing allowed, just vote again and bold it. Unless you were kidding..."
Huh, encouraging someone else to vote properly before you even vote yourself? How spineless.
"Okay, so I'm hearing some people say that the quiet ones are suspicious, while others are saying silence is golden and that those who talk most have the most to hide. I'll admit, right now I'm suspicious of both sides of the equation, but I've already voiced that I feel the really talkative ones have more to hide, so I'm leaning that way. Anyone care to weigh in on this? Which is more suspicious? The silent, not so active approach, or the talkative, very active approach?"
Do you have any conviction in your opinions at all, or do you need the roundtable to tell you what to think?
You know what? Maybe you are that stupid.
Vote: hylian
You're scum.
