I would really prefer if 2012 Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson won his lawsuit against the Commission on Presidential Debates and got actual campaigning money and actually won the next election, but since that won't happen, it's hard to say.
I think Hilary would be a much better President than Bush and Obama. I think she has similarities to both Presidents from the 90's. The good things about out Presidents from the 90's that the 2000's Presidents were lacking were simple. Unlike Bush 43, Bush 41 had decades of political experience by the time he became President and was actually a very diplomatic guy. Also, unlike his son, Bush 41 had a very good understanding of how the world worked. When he felt the need to go to war (a war which was far more justified than the 2003 Iraq war), he actually worked with the UN and other Arab countries. When the mission was complete, he sent his troops home instead of invading Iraq and having as he put it "a civil war where the Americans would be bogged down for many years". It's a perfect example of when a kid should have listened to his parents. With Clinton, he had the ability to actually work with his Republican counterparts, unlike Obama. This collaboration collapsed after the Lewinski scandal, but it was good for a time. The economy was doing great and Americans had a lot of confidence.
The bad thing about both Bush 41 and Clinton is that they both supported the North American Free Trade Agreement which kind of fucked us over. Nonetheless, I think Hilary probably has both good and bad qualities shared by the 41st and 42nd Presidents and would at least be an improvement over the 43rd and 44th Presidents.
Check out my art blog: http://jon-erich-art.blogspot.com
