| Richard_Feynman said:
How many games have forced online exactly? Comeon. I'm not being elitist. I know that for a fact, because if I were to be elitist you would damn sure know it. What I am doing is tackling his points with as much aplomb as I can muster. Why? It's damn obvious if you read my posts. " Just because some things are better doesn't mean everything is." I am well aware of this truth. But it seems to me that you've missed the entire point of this thread. He's complaining about a lack of games is the main thing I say is utter BS. He was the one to spin the argument in a different direction - not me. He's just whining about everything. |
I agree that he has spun the topic but the point is not lost on me, no. I think OP has a normal opinion but has presented it in a very unappealing manner. He sounds like a spoiled child in his responses but I don't believe that to be the intention. I think there's credence to him not being capable of articulating himself the way he should and we end up with "whining".
If he had presented himself more reasonably this thread would have came and went long ago. No insult to OP's intelligence however.
"You should be banned. Youre clearly flaming the president and even his brother who you know nothing about. Dont be such a partisan hack"
