| MoHasanie said: I don't think she'd be any better than Obama. |
i think she would be, because of experience. Obama was an unprecedented election because we elected somebody who has never had any experience in ever running anything in his life, and had a three year record in politics, a year and a half of which was spent campaignig for President. Obama also was raised in the political climate of Chicago, an area where the Republican party is almost unheard of and Democrats dominate, giving Obama zero experience in working with the opposition.
Clinton will have had her whole political track record for the past 16 years (not that i'm saying any of it is necessarily good!), plus although it's true she was a senator from New York, she did have experience as the spouse of a Democrat in a state like Arkansas where the opposition would be very close. Bill Clinton had quite a bit of experience in negotiating with Republicans having been from Arkansas.
not that i'm trying to support Clinton in here, but i do think she would be a lot better than Obama.
