By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
mrstickball said:
Loud -

Despite the fact that I would say that Fable was a letdown (as an owner of it), the fact is, reviewers, and general opinion gave Fable a MUCH better view than that of Killzone.

Fable - 85.1% Avg Rating (114 Reviews), 8.3 User Rating
Killzone - 73.3% Avg Rating (78 Reviews), 7.8 User Rating


So, one could say that Killzone 2 will have the better improvement, since the ratings for Killzone 1 were so abysmal.

And why are we arguing this against people that either:

1) Don't own a X360
2) Don't care about X360 games, unless to bash them.



THATS what I forgot to mention.  Fable maintained a much higher average even with 30% more reviews.

It is true that it is easier for Killzone to improve because it has more room to improve (lol), but the issue is there is no indication the game is improving in any area but grahpics.  Lionhead is talking about co-op, integrated arcade games, AI features and combat systems, whilst Guerilla is discussing framerates and polygon counts.  The main problem with the first killzone wasn't graphics, it was gimped gameplay.

 



starcraft - Playing Games = FUN, Talking about Games = SERIOUS