By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
NiKKoM said:
DonFerrari said:
NiKKoM said:
I wished that Sony would have been taken out of de equation.. don't need that overhead..
Let Ubisoft, EA, Activision come up with their own subscriptions and let them try to make it worthwhile for me.. even better let a Company like Amazon come with a sub on my console


Do you want the platform holder to be taken out of their platform?

Yes.. There is no need for the ancient idea of paying a platform holder.. MS doesn't charge whats released on Windows.. Google has its app store.. But android is open to other stores like amazon which google doesn't get money from..

It holds back price competition and new ideas like the EA access.. Surley if Sony wants PSnow on android or iOS you don't want Apple and Google stopping them and charge money as a platform holder.

Actually in a closed enviroment that is what I would expect. Even more when the service would cost them money to facilitate or take out from their offering (altough the later could be saw as a anti-thrust law breaking).



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."