Normchacho said:
fighter said:
Normchacho said:
but wouldn't that still be a pain? What If I want to try a game from another publisher but I don't want to try enough of them to warrant adding them? Would this plan also limit us to larger publishers while blocking smaller ones from being part of the program?
It just seems needlesly restrictive to me. Where is the benifit over just having them all in together?
|
how is having an additionnal option a restriction ? What service/ feature is lost ?
|
It's not more options. Taking a pie and cutting it in half doesn't mean you have more options, you just have the same option segmented up.
Making you physically choose to have access to games from a certain publisher rather than just letting have access to them all is pointless and doesn't take away anything. As I said, you could very well lose smaller publishers or self publishing developers in a model like this because they are left to sustain themselves in the program.
|
so it's an additional way of eating the same pie --> additional option