By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Ka-pi96 said:
DonFerrari said:
Ka-pi96 said:

Yes there are, not likely to be any more though and that would solely be Sonys fault, they are the ones that bashed EA about EA access. If EA really wanted to react to Sony's condemnation they could stop supporting PS platforms entirely, other companies have done similar things, that too would be solely Sony's fault.

Yeah they put games on PS+ for money, not very much money though. Is it so wrong of them to want more money? Can you honestly say you would turn down more money yourself?

Well EA could drop their support for Sony and I wouldn't care... They probably wouldn't benefit much from it.

Yeah it wouldn't be a good choice but I was just making a point that they could do that, if they really wanted, and IMO Sony would be more at fault than EA if they were to do so.

Both would lose... who would lose more would depend on if Sony can keep good sells without EA or if EA could generate enough profit being only on MS.

But yes, if we were just to look at EA being pissed and cutting support Sony would be at fault (since even if they didn't made this awfull declaration it would be their job to keep 3rd party support).



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."