Ka-pi96 said:
Yeah it wouldn't be a good choice but I was just making a point that they could do that, if they really wanted, and IMO Sony would be more at fault than EA if they were to do so. |
Both would lose... who would lose more would depend on if Sony can keep good sells without EA or if EA could generate enough profit being only on MS.
But yes, if we were just to look at EA being pissed and cutting support Sony would be at fault (since even if they didn't made this awfull declaration it would be their job to keep 3rd party support).

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







