DonFerrari on 03 August 2014
Doctorslim said:
DonFerrari said:
VanceIX said:
Oh really? And pray tell me, what's wrong with an OPTIONAL service that gives gamers discounts and access to a vast amount of games? If you don't like it, fine. But what you're saying is that NO other gamer should be able to decide if it is a good value for themselves, just because you don't feel it is.
What right do you have to decide for other gamers what's a good value and what's not? Can you answer that? No, because you don't represent every gamer, not even close.
This is like someone wanting Netflix removed from game consoles just because they don't use it, and they feel it might compete with Sony's video store. Both Netflix and EA Access are completely optional services. Heck, EA access is cheaper than Netflix and doesn't even compete directly with any of Sony's services, the way Netflix does.
Your argument is flawed to the core, simply because you assume that everyone perceives value the same as you do, which they don't. That's why we have options in the real world.
|
I don't see value in EA access because I don't play their games... but I'm pretty darned certain that a lot of people will... I even said in a different thread that it would be good to have a "cable plan" for PS4 where you can choose what publishers you want to have access.
|
Wow can you contradict yourself anymore? So pretty much what you're saying is that if any other company does this it's okay, but because it's EA it's not? You sir are very bias towards either EA or Microsoft
|
Please read it right.
I said I don't see value in the service because I don't play their games (and even said I know that several people see value on it), I don't see a problem with it existing. And avoid calling other people biased or putting more than 3 quotes in the tree since it's bannable offense.
