Raziel123 on 03 August 2014
| VanceIX said: Having options is ALWAYS a good thing for the consumer, so this PR of them looking out for the consumer is bullsh*t. What they mean is that it would risk their monopoly on PS+. |
I don't care if they did it because they were looking out for the consumer or not, because the end result is that they were looking out for us, regardless of motive. PS+ is better if Ea access doesn't exist on PS. Therefore there is no choice involved. "options" are good for consumers when there are no negative consequences to those that do not adhere. EA access has negative consequences for those that do not sub to access but are subbed to PS+.
It's that simple. No option, just EA+MS rip off.
