You're arguing that EA access is awful by creating hypothetical examples of what 'could' potentially happen? Sure, EA could put fifa 15 on there for a day and remove it but they could also keep it on there for a year. Sure they could have exclusive DLC available only to EA access subscribers but why criticise them for it when Sony and MS have been doing exclusive or timed exclusive DLC for years and on a much wider scale. Sure this sort of thing has to stop somewhere but the main culprits are sony (watch dogs, destiny) and microsoft (cod, the division).
"And what about DLC? You buy the DLC and then lose access to the game. Wasted money on DLC. Have to buy the game anyway..to keep playing it. How many times do you want to pay for the damn game? Jeez." They would only be paying for the game once, when they actually buy it. Subscribing to EA access isn't paying for a game, its paying for access to the vault and the added perks along with it, some of which you completely ignore such as 10% savings on all digital purchases such as DLC and full game downloads.
Your entire argument is based around fiction and consumer ignorance. EA is seen as some kind of monster so you create these hypothetical arguments based around that notion eg. EA could remove a game after a day, create exclusive dlc for EA access subscribers etc. You also create arguments were you see EA access as restricting when it's not, subscribers are paying for 10% of all digital purchases on EA games and access to a vault which will contain EA games. They are not paying for access to a specific game although some may feel that way.
Existing User Log In
New User Registration
Register for a free account to gain full access to the VGChartz Network and join our thriving community.
