By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DarkD said:
DonFerrari said:
DarkD said:


Sony isn't dead, it's on life support.  Even now analysts still think its 50-50 that Sony just up and declares bankruptcy or sells everything in the next couple of years.  That atmosphere is bad for the consumer.  It's better to just let it go at that point.    

I'm bitter because I have to deal with bad and redundant arguments for this stuff.  For starters, everything you asked about, you should be able to answer yourself from the previous posts.


Please explain how a company on life support beat 2 giant and really health company anyway... and as far as I remember Sony made good use of all the money I invested in my PS3 giving me several games to play, from mine 130 games at least half is published by them.

Bad question is bad....  Should be one of the most well known facts in the gaming industry.  You know when Sony did the "We aren't gonna have DRM" thing.  Then people showered their presentation with praise even though otherwise the presentation didn't have many games to show at all.  People instantly villianized Microsoft at that moment.  

Nintendo was dead from the get-go..  Making the Wii the winner of the last console generation had already soured much of Nintendo's reputation.  They didn't stand a chance no matter what they released.  They're gaining back some traction now that Sony and Microsoft are tripping up all over the place.  


thx I have my answer... you don't have any idea what you are talking about... Sony in life support put more exclusives, get more third support, dev a stronger system with cheaper price/flop, than others. but your answer is that we should instead support the company that wanted to rip us, and that nintendo flopped because it got sucessfull the last gen... So maybe that is the brilliant conclusion why PS3 flopped, people hated it because PS2 was sucessfull... and I already posted a thread on why WiiU got a rise in sales and it was a consensus that it have to do with MK8 getting attention not ps4/x1 flumbing (as both also got increased sales when WiiU rose).



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."