By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari on 02 August 2014
Edit Thread
KLXVER said:
DonFerrari said:

Yep pretty much this... a game that could be launched fast, be gorgeous and fill the holes is a good approach, and of course we would love it being cheaper, but there is more reason to make it 50 than 30... And from what I heard WW HD is a fantastic improvement... TLOUR is being regarded good, and probably Halo MCC will be good as well... so they are very much worth remasters/remakes.


WWHD and MCC is not the same thing. One is a 10 year old SD game where they fixed the problems people had with it and the other has 4 games(one which is 10 years old)

They aint the same thing, but for each of the bases they are a needed game, that is all that is about it.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."