By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
KLXVER said:
overman1 said:

The OG PS3 was backward compatable and because of that (and various other factors) it was very expensive and we know how that intially turned out. 

Also, why cant MS answer this same question? Didnt they remade Halo: Comat Evolved for the 360? So, of the 6 Halo games, 5 are already on the 360. so why re-release the MCC when they could have made the Xbox One BC? Sony makes one remaster and half the gaming world goes to shit about this, yet fail to ask the other side the same exact question.

Lastly, what the hell does PS Now have to with BC on the ps4? you can use the STREAMING SERVICE on all sony electronics including their TVs, so what does that got to do with BC? 


Yeah, the BC was the thing that made the PS3 so expensive.../sarcasm

 

PSNow is coming to the PS4, isnt it?

So you think backward compatibility on Ps4 would be free or how much do you think having cell would cost? Or just that Ps4 should use cell2 and still be harder to dev?





duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."