Why The Last of Us Remastered Shouldn’t Really Exist

[DonFerrari]

Experimental42 said:

DonFerrari said:

 

Yeah sure. If you feel like it.doesn't seem small improvements but ok 2x the pixels and framerates, and the models/textures enhancements for basically the same price of TLOU on ps3 is terrible value. Have all games dropped to 20 dollars a year late? Most launch games of PS4 are above 40 right now. But okay if you want to cherrypick conditions for a remaster to be good and others shouldn't even exist.

I've never said it shouldn't exist. I'm saying it's currently inferior to MCC in terms of value and improvement and that's why people are complaining about one and not the other. There's no subjectivity there, it's hard fact.

Are you really dense enough to believe it took more effort to upgrade TLoU, an HD game itself, to HD for a new console, than it took to make similar upgrades to the original Halo alone? On top of that, there's 4 games, all with full add-on content, and access to the Halo 5 beta. It's not even remotely ****ing close to compare the two.

Value is subjective and I won't discuss this. Regarding the effort yes Halo MCC probably took more but I don't remember a lot of people praising Sly remaster and all others so this aint defense to praise Halo and criticize TLOUR. And when people start complaining about Halo you won't say it's because of lack of value or effort I'm sure.