Madword said:
DarkD said:
o_O.Q said:
DarkD said:
Sony is broke, so of course they're gonna have a crappy console generation. They're still losing money year over year so they can't really do much R&D. Gamers basically put their faith in a dead horse. Say what you want about what Sony wants to do, but they have the financial power to do almost none of it. This generation expect to see a lot of bargain bin practices from Sony. |
...third parties alone will ensure that the ps4 has a better gen than the wii u for example
...this is why we can speak of arkham knight, destiny, the witcher 3, metal gear, the division, Kingdom Hearts, final Fantasy etc etc etc releasing in the future for ps4 and the one
...Or do those games not count?
Whereas first party support between all 3 is about the same, by that I mean roughly the same number of titles have been announced for all 3 so to me your post doesn't make much sense
Assessment of the actually facts in question would undoubtedly lead to the wii u being the dead horse I'd think
|
My post is saying that if gamers supported either of the other two consoles, they would have a better generation because either one of them could reciprocate that investment a lot better than Sony can. All Sony is doing is eating the money and hoping they don't go bankrupt.
|
OMG are you saying what you were originally saying was not sarcasm... gah, I missed that then.
For a crappy console that cant do much R&D, isnt it ironic that out of the three companies they made the best hardware, best formfactor and best hardware features.. laughable really.
|
You mean they made the console that most heavily emphasizes graphics... They had to do that after they made the PS3... I don't even consider that a good thing. Look how many developers went bankrupt over the last generation. We should stop the graphics push for awhile. It's killing every other aspect of gaming, you know the important parts (fun, creativity, lots of genres). That's why indies and smart phone games are booming so much right now.
